Is Alisson Becker signing for Juventus? Why Liverpool goalkeeper transfer is ‘Possible’ in 2027 – Football Whispers Index score

Alisson Becker's contract at Liverpool now has less than a year to run.

Juventus wanted him last summer and were turned away.

Now, with no extension talks yet begun at Anfield, that interest is being talked up again.

Alisson Becker to Juventus rated ‘Possible'

The Football Whispers Index scores every transfer rumour across five weighted factors. Read how it works here.

The model weighs affordability, need, motivation, the selling club's incentive and the strength of the reporting behind a move.

Here the numbers are lopsided, since this deal is financially straightforward but Liverpool's stated desire to keep their goalkeeper drags the rest of the score down hard.

The single fact that decides where this sits is Liverpool's own message to Alisson's camp, that they count on him.

Financial viability

Money is the one part of this deal Juventus do not need to lose sleep over.

A player who costs nothing beyond wages fits neatly into a club still working off a UEFA settlement rather than spending toward one.

The catch is timing rather than cash, since a 34-year-old arriving for free still has to justify a marquee salary rather than a marquee fee.

Buying club need

Juventus are not shopping out of desperation this month, and that matters for how urgent this really is.

Vicario's loan buys Turin time rather than solves the problem permanently, since his deal there runs out on exactly the same date as Alisson's at Anfield.

The underlying numbers make the case for an upgrade regardless of the calendar, with Alisson preventing nearly a goal more than expected across the same number of games Vicario has conceded from.

Grabara's absence removes Juventus's other fallback option just as that comparison is being drawn.

Player motivation

On sporting terms alone this move is hard to sell to the player himself.

Dropping almost six points in Opta's rankings is the kind of gap that normally only makes sense as a lifestyle decision, not a competitive one.

Nothing in the reporting suggests Alisson is pushing for an exit, and silence from Anfield over a new contract is not the same thing as him wanting to leave.

Selling club incentive

This is where the rumour runs into its biggest obstacle.

Romano's report was not a vague brush-off; it was Liverpool directly telling Alisson's representatives that the club count on him, which is about as explicit as a retention stance gets.

Mamardashvili's presence complicates the picture rather than resolving it, because a club that has already lined up a successor still has to decide when to actually hand him the gloves.

A goalkeeper still winning individual plaudits, like the Bournemouth save that drew a Save of the Month nomination, gives Liverpool even less reason to rush that decision.

Market momentum

Strip away the republishing and this rumour currently rests on a single report.

The suggestion Juventus “could revive” interest is speculative framing, not confirmation of an approach, a bid or contact with Alisson's camp.

Grabara's injury and Vicario's ever-present role in Turin explain why that speculation exists, even if they have not yet turned it into anything concrete.

Alisson Becker to Juventus: Will or won't it happen?

The case for this happening is built entirely on the calendar rather than on any current momentum.

If Liverpool still have not sat down with Alisson's camp by January, a free departure in June becomes their biggest risk and Juventus's biggest opening.

Until that renewal conversation either starts or stalls publicly, this stays exactly where the model has it, plausible but not close.